|
whufcroe
3:52 Mon Aug 24
Re: If we sign Song?
|
"but will cost in wages and likely to be more than Austin"
So Song is going to be on £90+k a week and Austin will pay for free then?
|
Thames Ironworks
3:49 Mon Aug 24
Re: If we sign Song?
|
Not annoyed, just stating the fact we could be spending funds on Song (an injured player) and not on Austin because of concerns over injury.
The Song situation seems too similar to when we signed Carroll (who was injured at the time).
|
El Scorchio
3:42 Mon Aug 24
Re: If we sign Song?
|
We don't know they're not after a striker. In fact they are, as the y have said
You just seem annoyed that we're not after Charlie Austin specifically.
|
|
|
|